Only real judgments
Every answer is built from actual Indian case law — and every claim carries the page it came from, so you can check it yourself.
It plans the research, reads the judgments, drafts, and keeps your deadlines. And before it touches anything of yours, it asks. Every single time.
Legal AI is software that reads case law and works on a matter alongside an advocate. Lawgger's agent answers only from the 2.07 crore Indian judgments on file — the Supreme Court and all 25 High Courts — pin-cites every sentence to the page it came from, checks each authority is still good law, drafts, and proposes deadlines that are saved only when you confirm.
Add deadline — Reply due 14 Aug 2026 · State v. Rathore
It can, when it reads real Indian judgments instead of writing from memory. This is the work an AI legal assistant for Indian advocates actually has to do — research, official court records, tribunals, deadlines. Lawgger's agent knows which job needs doing and shows its working as it goes. Hover any card to see more.
Nothing that touches your data. It will read, search and reason on its own — but the AI never changes anything in your chamber by itself. When it wants to act, a card appears, and the change is saved by you, from your account, only when you tap Confirm. The agent proposes; you dispose.
Track case — State v. Rathore · next hearing auto-updates
Flip the state. Nothing is ever saved until you say so.
That depends on the question, so you choose. Search answers in seconds. Deep Research takes 1–4 minutes — and that is the point, because it reads everything before it writes. Pro sits in between. All three end the same way: pin-cited to the page, with every authority checked.
One quick pass over the law. Right answer, right citation, right now.
A reasoned pass — search, citator check, then grounded synthesis.
The agent plans, loops through its tools, cross-checks, and writes — showing every step as it goes.
No. General chatbots produce plausible-sounding case names because they compose text rather than read judgments — the problem the profession now calls an AI hallucination. Lawgger is powerful and kept on a short leash by three habits it never breaks.
Every answer is built from actual Indian case law — and every claim carries the page it came from, so you can check it yourself.
"Cite a case where a s.302 conviction was quashed under s.482 at trial stage."
✕ The law doesn't support that claim. Lawgger says so — it doesn't guess.
A deadline, a tracked case, a saved draft — nothing is written until you tap Confirm. Suggested by AI, decided by you.
₹1,999 a month, or ₹19,999 a year — about ₹66 a day. There is no separate AI add-on, no per-question meter and no sales call.
That one line item carries the agent and everything it works on: AI legal research across 2.07 crore Indian judgments from the Supreme Court and all 25 High Courts, a good-law verdict on every authority, live display boards for the High Courts and the major tribunals, cause lists for any court and date, case tracking by CNR, the limitation clocks, drafting from 3,500+ Indian legal formats and the practice side — matters, tasks, billing and GST invoices.
Before you pay anything, every plan opens with a 14-day free trial of the whole product, and no card is asked for to begin. If you are weighing this against a general chatbot, the honest version of that comparison is set out in ChatGPT for lawyers in India; if you are weighing it against a research subscription, start with what legal research costs in India. Full terms and the plans sit on the pricing page.
One thing the price does not buy is the right to stop reading. Lawgger is a software company, not a law firm, and it gives no legal advice — the advocate stays responsible for what is filed. That is precisely why every claim opens the judgment at the page it came from, and why your matters are never used as AI training data.
Yes, when it reads real Indian judgments rather than writing from memory. Lawgger answers only from the judgments on file — 2.07 crore of them across the Supreme Court and all 25 High Courts — and pins every sentence to the page it came from, so you can open the source and read it yourself before you rely on it.
No. Every citation Lawgger gives you comes from a judgment that exists on file, and the pin-cite opens that judgment at the exact page. General chatbots write plausible-sounding case names because they compose text rather than read judgments. Lawgger also checks each authority for good law before it reaches your answer.
An assistant is only as good as what it can actually read. Lawgger reads 2.07 crore full-text Indian judgments from the Supreme Court and all 25 High Courts, plus 1,607 central and state acts across 37 jurisdictions, and it works in ten Indian languages. Coverage, not adjectives, is what decides the answer.
Yes, and Lawgger is built so that verifying takes seconds rather than an afternoon. Every claim carries a pin-cite that opens the judgment at that page, and each authority shows whether it is still good law or has been overruled. The advocate remains responsible for what is filed. Lawgger gives no legal advice.
No Bar Council of India rule bars an advocate from using technology to research. What the courts have made clear is that the advocate carries full responsibility for the accuracy of anything filed, including citations. That is why pin-cited answers with a good-law verdict on each authority matter more than fluency.
₹1,999 a month or ₹19,999 a year — about ₹66 a day — for the agent and everything around it: research, live court boards, cause lists, drafting, deadlines, matters and billing. There is a 14-day free trial with no card.